In many near-shore and outsourcing environments, the product owner role is difficult to shape well. It centres on building external products based on pre-set client requirements, so product owners end up acting as structural translators between client and development team. They receive instructions, shape them into user stories, and the team builds. There is rarely space to question whether those requirements are right.
A different approach starts with giving product owners the authority and scope to lead the full lifecycle – and that starts with product discovery.
Product discovery is an active, ongoing process product owners should lead from the start of any project – before development begins. They should ensure engineering effort goes towards problems that have been validated with real users. In practice, that means:
As AI takes on more technical execution, the line between strategy and production is starting to blur. At Damilah, we are actively investing in this shift, developing our product people towards a new hybrid role: the product engineer.
A product engineer combines strong product thinking with hands-on technical capability. By training our product people to work with live coding tools and AI, we are building professionals who can take a product from discovery through to a working prototype.

Iskra Ristovska is one of our product leaders moving from a classical product owner role towards that of a product engineer.
Working with a core client, she uses the client’s internal AI tools to analyse data, map dependencies and extract requirements in real time. During user discovery sessions, she works in a live coding environment, building, testing and refining prototypes on the spot. This shortens the gap between vision and working software, so customer feedback turns into tangible results quickly.
To support this way of working, we run a weekly review session with key stakeholders. We present the latest prototype, gather feedback and implement changes within the same cycle. The pace only works because it stays anchored to genuine client pain points – the AI tools support that focus, rather than becoming an end in themselves.
“We don’t wait for discovery to finish before we start building. We build during discovery, so customer feedback can turn into something tangible in the same session.” – Iskra Ristovska, Product Leader at Damilah
When product ownership is reduced to backlog management, something gets lost at every handoff. The product manager speaks to the client, translates requirements to a designer, who hands them to an engineer, and something is lost at each step. That is how product feature factories form: lots of activity, bloated budget and not enough impact.
Our investment in product capability addresses that directly. Our product owners bring senior-level discovery expertise and live-coding technical capabilities. With Damilah, you get a partner who understands your business architecture, can challenge your assumptions, and move from problem to working solution faster.
If you would like to explore how this approach could strengthen your product delivery and reduce friction between strategy and execution, get in touch here to start the conversation.
Across many of the tech ecosystems that have built reputations on software delivery, we see strong engineering talent and reliable execution, but limited experience of real product ownership.
Central and Eastern Europe is home to over 3.5 million employed IT specialists, one of the largest regional tech workforces in the world. Yet for much of the past decade, the dominant model for that talent has been outsourcing and staff augmentation: building other people’s products, to other people’s specifications. According to Dreamix’s 2026 overview of the region, the sector has only recently begun shifting beyond staff augmentation, with partners starting to expect product direction and strategic thinking alongside delivery.
North Macedonia is a good example of this dynamic. Despite a wealth of technical capability, the local industry has historically tilted heavily towards traditional IT outsourcing, exporting talent to build products for international clients.
That model has driven real economic growth. But it has also limited how product culture develops. When a company functions primarily as an outsourced partner, its teams are frequently positioned as pure executors. Requirements arrive pre-packaged from abroad, and success is measured by output – tickets closed, deadlines met, specifications followed – rather than by actual outcomes for users.
In many offshore organisations, product owners and managers act mainly as go-betweens. The role is often limited to translating external client requirements into technical user stories, managing the backlog, and feeding specifications to development teams. Because teams are rarely part of the initial problem-solving phase, they miss out on the product discovery work that surfaces real customer pain points.
“Moving away from a pure execution mindset requires shifting our definition of success. True product culture is not about how many features an organisation can ship; it is about deeply understanding user needs and developing the autonomy to create meaningful solutions.” – Olgica Strezoska, Principal Product Owner at Damilah
Cultural change begins when someone recognises a gap and decides to do something about it.
At Damilah, we are proud to have people like that on the team. One of our Principal Product Owners, Olgica Strezoska, recognised the need to strengthen product thinking within North Macedonia’s tech ecosystem. She saw that building a sustainable product culture required a dedicated foundation of community support, knowledge exchange and continuous education.

Driven by this vision, she co-founded ProdACT, a non-profit she now leads as President.
ProdACT is an educational hub for product practitioners across North Macedonia – a place to develop product thinking, learn from peers and engage with modern methodologies.
“Product culture doesn’t develop in isolation. It grows when people share what they’ve learned, challenge each other and build on each other’s experiences. That’s what ProdACT exists to create.” – Olgica Strezoska, Principal Product Owner at Damilah
Through events and curated content, Olgica advocates for outcome-focused roadmaps, user-centric design and genuine team participation in product strategy.
Olgica’s work in the community reflects the core product values we hold at Damilah. We intentionally move away from the assembly-line execution model, giving our product professionals the autonomy and tools they need to do their best work.
Product owners at Damilah operate well beyond the traditional scope. They take part in proactive product discovery, leading efforts to surface the right requirements rather than wait for the customer to pass them down. In practice, this includes:
As AI takes on more of the execution work, expectations of delivery partners are changing. Clients are no longer looking to hire developers to execute a static checklist. They need a partner to focus on driving their key business metrics and avoid slipping into feature factory mode.
“The biggest misconception about [modern] Eastern European outsourcing is that you’re buying hours. You’re not. You’re buying engineering judgement.” – Denis Danov, CTO at Dreamix
Instead of simply checking off tasks, your offshore/near-shore software development partner should be committed to building successful products that deliver sustainable, measurable market value. This is what we call partner-shoring – and it starts with bringing product thinking to the table: knowing which problems to solve, in which order, and why.
If you would like to work with a near-shore software development partner that brings product judgement as well as engineering strength, get in touch here to explore how we can support your next stage of growth.

A joint Damilah & CTO Craft survey of senior technology leaders
We commissioned this survey with CTO Craft to understand how senior technology leaders see engineering roles and skills evolving by 2028.
We chose 2028 deliberately: it’s far enough beyond operational planning to require leadership thinking, but close enough to demand action now.
Here’s a summary of the report. Download your copy today to understand how you can apply the findings to your own organisation and be prepared for systemic change.
92% of survey respondents reported to be already using AI and seeing benefits.
Most do not expect AI to shrink their teams; they expect it to increase output. Productivity is increasing, which in turn drives demand for more products and software.
For years, engineering speed has been the main constraint when it comes to software development.
AI has almost removed this constraint, so that now the bottlenecks are around idea discovery, review, governance, and alignment.
Less experienced leaders see AI as augmenting existing roles and skills.
Those with more extensive AI experience have higher expectations of AI’s impact and envisage teams becoming AI orchestrators.
This means moving from single tools to multi-agent platforms, where deep expertise will be less important than a breadth of understanding.
AI excels at execution: the “how”.
Humans remain responsible for the “why”.
As AI capability increases, leadership capability becomes even more important. The “human moat” surrounding AI and governance comprises skills such as strategy, context, empathy and ethics, as well as commercial judgement.
Download the complete survey findings to explore:
A joint Damilah & CTO Craft survey of senior technology leaders





We all know that AI is transforming the way software is developed. But how many of us are clear on exactly what kinds of business benefits it can deliver? We wanted to develop a better understanding of this, to ensure we maximise the productivity and quality gains AI is able to deliver, and also to…

One of my first experiences with AI was revealing, even though it wasn’t in a professional context. My child was unwell with a cough and I’d heard that putting a chopped onion in the room can help to alleviate the symptoms, but wasn’t sure if it was just myth. So I asked ChatGPT this question:…

First, I should start with a confession: we recently managed to annoy a dozen of our software engineers. That’s because we ran a hackathon to test the gains that could be made through the use of AI. To benchmark the results, we needed some of our developers to work in a control group, using traditional…
eBook
I remember examining one trust’s rules on preventing staff from working too many long days in a row. These rules keep patterns safe, but they aren’t one-size-fits-all and often require a more nuanced approach. For example, a high-intensity inpatient ward needs much tighter guardrails than, say, a 9-5 community service.
And that means everything can get very complex, very quickly.
Until now, trusts have frequently needed to find workarounds to accommodate such scenarios, since most software providers don’t offer this level of configurability – largely because older legacy systems simply can’t manage that kind of complexity.
But, recently, we’ve been asking ourselves: do we need to be so rigid? Particularly because the integration of AI into software development processes is opening up a whole new world of possibilities that can help providers solve challenges like these.
So, we’re now experimenting with automation that uses AI to let units set their own workflows without needing a developer to change the core code. The goal here is to build a system flexible enough to handle such demands – turning what used to be a technical blocker into a genuine innovation.
The kind of challenge and solution outlined above is just one example of the way AI is starting to become a powerful problem-solving tool for rostering software providers.
In our experience, the most common challenges are:
These real-world headaches mean that, all too all too frequently, many end users have to struggle with inflexible, underperforming tools or the burden of manual admin, while managing unpredictable demand, unforeseen scenarios and frequent last-minute changes.
Based on our experience of working closely with rostering software providers, we have a clear picture of these major pain points and how such issues are all too common across many industries.

But we also know there’s another way, where AI tools can provide simple, rapid and adaptable solutions that allow workforces to focus on their core competencies rather than hours of admin.
In general, effective, future-ready rostering must therefore be highly configurable, in order to adapt to those varying requirements. It must be able to flex to sector-specific constraints. And it must support different models – such as filling time-based slots (perhaps hospital shifts) versus filling service needs (such as when planning a higher education institute’s timetable).
To achieve outcomes like this, AI tools offer the opportunity to massively shorten feedback loops when developing and iterating new versions of existing systems. It’s even possible for providers to undertake rapid prototyping and validation in a live environment. This could involve working directly with end users to build multiple iterations of a system in order to demonstrate exactly how a solution will work in practice.
Additionally, AI’s ability to analyse vast data sets can deliver valuable predictive analytics, such as an understanding of when staff absences or customer/patient demand are most likely to be at their peak. Based on historical data patterns, it can make intelligent suggestions for administrators to choose from.
Or, as in the example at the beginning, AI’s capacity to take on previously impossible challenges enables developers to solve major technical problems that previously would have been considered far too time-consuming and financially unfeasible. An AI-powered tool can also help to ensure rostering is done as fairly as possible, without any human biases. With a good dose of transparency, it can show staff how and why rostering decisions are made so no one feels they are being singled out for unfair treatment – for example, by demonstrating that everyone will end up working an equal number of public holidays throughout the year.

Despite the undeniable advantages that AI can bring to rostering tools, for the foreseeable future there will always need to be human involvement throughout the process. The overriding aim should be to improve productivity by reducing development or admin time, rather than to replace human judgement.
In the first instance, we would always recommend that AI features be introduced gradually into rostering tools and with full transparency – not only to ensure maximum effectiveness, but also to help build trust among users.
Before moving to anything near full automation, a tool should offer explainable alternatives to users – for example, by suggesting several options with a rationale of why it has proposed each one. It would then be up to the human administrator to select the most appropriate, all the while helping the AI to learn what works best in that specific organisation’s context.
Transparency and explainability are also crucial when it comes to ensuring all outputs lead to full compliance, particularly in sectors like healthcare and education, where regulatory observance and safety are critical.
The future of AI-powered, demand-driven rostering and rostering software development – using systems that are accurate, compliant and sensitive to end users’ needs – is now within reach.
To get there, it requires a highly collaborative approach between end users and software developers who have in-depth product and domain knowledge and are powered by expert engineers with advanced AI skills.
To find out more about how we can help you remove the pain from rostering software development with our AI-powered solutions, get in touch now.
Iskra Ristovska, Principal Product Owner at Damilah
Zellis is the UK and Ireland’s leading provider of AI-enabled HR, workforce management, and payroll software and services, working with many large top-tier organisations.
The company’s flagship HCM suite is used by millions of employees every month to view interactive digital payslips, book annual leave, submit expenses, and more. Zellis’s clear ambition is to power exceptional employee experiences through a consumer-grade and engaging user experience.
To support and strengthen product development as part of a major investment programme, Zellis decided to engage Damilah as a near-shore partner.
The key selection criteria were set out as follows:
After a structured RFP process, Zellis were impressed by our capabilities and our ‘partner-shoring’ approach – where a client and near-shore partner work seamlessly together towards common goals – so selected us as one of their development partners, beginning in early 2024.
Zellis were looking for a new and unique way of presenting a more visualised version of employees’ salary information, using a very specific design structure. This was complex work – but rather than tackle some of the easier elements of the project first, we decided to lean into this task straight away.
And, by the end of our first two-week sprint, we were able to deliver a working demo.

“I was immediately very pleased with this, as a lot of developers would want to tackle the easier parts first to show rapid progress, especially at the start of the relationship,” says Bob Hoskins, Director of Product Management – HR & WFM.
“So, we’ve benefited from a real mix of work from Damilah,” Bob adds. “The high-profile parts that make it into the corporate videos; and also, in the background, the real nuts and bolts of delivering the product.”
Throughout, the Zellis team have been particularly impressed by our:
The project is now close to launch – and Zellis have been delighted with what we have helped them to achieve.
In particular, the following outcomes have stood out for them:
In all, Zellis fully expect features like this, and the overall redeveloped product, to drive added value for their customers.
As for the future, we are exploring further ways to help Zellis achieve further growth, especially in areas where they may need to flex rapidly.
“In particular, Damilah are ideally suited where we have a critical deliverable with challenging timelines, and a high degree of technical uncertainty and ambiguity. We describe them as being like our ‘special forces’, whom we can rapidly deploy to solve the toughest problems.” says Phil.
In summary, Phil has the following to say about us:
“They’re great to work with, and they really value their people. Generally speaking, in software engineering, a small number of very bright people will outperform large teams of mediocre people. Damilah truly demonstrate that – it’s their philosophy.”
Bob adds:
“I’ve been impressed by their honesty throughout. They’re not afraid to challenge our thought processes or to push back, and they don’t sit on problems until they explode. It feels like they’re a natural extension of our own team, which is exactly what you want from a partner.”
At the second of our CTO Breakfast Briefings, where technology executives gathered to examine the growing influence of AI on the software development lifecycle, Aleksandar Karavasilev, CTO at Damilah, shared the results of Damilah’s AI experiments. These revealed practical gains and sparked further discussion around how AI is reshaping team workflows, engineering oversight, and productivity.
Aleksandar opened the session by presenting findings from structured experiments using tools like GitHub Copilot and Cursor. One example showed how engineers used Cursor to analyse over 900 SQL procedures, reducing what would typically take weeks into a few days. Across 80 engineers, the company recorded over 400 – 500 hours saved in just three months.
While the productivity gains were clear, attendees agreed that traditional metrics, such as story points or cycle time, struggle to reflect the real impact of AI assistance. Some have started running side-by-side comparisons using past sprint data. Others rely on direct feedback from engineers to assess where AI adds the most value.
Participants discussed optimal approaches to handling bugs in AI-generated code. They generally agreed that no AI tool is capable of producing perfect code.
In particular, “code bloat” was highlighted as a major issue. In other words, as AI operates so rapidly, it’s easy to generate huge amounts of code – and inevitably the more code that exists, the more bugs there will be.
Because of this, there was a consensus that:
Security and compliance featured heavily in the conversation. Organisations are under pressure to ensure that AI tools don’t expose sensitive information or create audit gaps. A few attendees discussed:
These measures allow AI to be used in sensitive industries like finance and healthcare.
As AI becomes more integrated into workflows, its operational cost has come under scrutiny. Attendees noted the rising expenses of using large language models through public APIs and the unpredictability of long-term pricing.
Alternatives currently under consideration include:
These strategies aim to make AI adoption more sustainable while maintaining data privacy and performance.
Attendees agreed that AI is influencing how engineers work. By offloading repetitive or time-intensive tasks, AI enables developers to focus on problem-solving and innovation.
However, participants raised concerns about the learning curve for junior engineers. If AI handles too much, new developers risk missing foundational knowledge. Several organisations now combine AI tooling with mentorship programmes and hands-on training. One attendee noted that AI should be treated as a peer contributor: fast, efficient, but imperfect, always requiring human oversight.
Attendees discussed how AI, particularly LLMs and generative tools, is forcing product and commercial leaders to reconsider SaaS business models. One speaker described the tension between using AI to accelerate a content-driven business while also facing existential risk from the same technology. As AI agents shift how people search, consume, and generate content, traditional SEO-led monetisation strategies may become less effective. Another participant noted that the ease of creating AI-powered workflows has made it harder to differentiate products, urging businesses to focus on their unique value propositions. Several attendees agreed that pricing models would need to evolve, moving away from flat-fee SaaS toward usage-based or outcome-driven approaches.
AI tools have moved from experimentation to execution. They’re helping engineering leaders solve long-standing problems, accelerate timelines, and explore new ways of working. But the session also made it clear that success depends on structure: on clear governance, trusted oversight, and shared learning.

In traditional IT outsourcing, the product owner role tends to shrink to one task: backlog management. Requirements come in, user stories go out. That model is starting to show its limits. There is growing recognition that product owners in outsourced teams need more than backlog management skills and that the role itself needs to evolve.

When tech ecosystems are shaped by outsourcing and staff augmentation, software development teams risk becoming expert executors. But, especially in the age of AI, what they need is a strong product culture: a mindset that focuses on user outcomes, not just shipped features.

AI maturity starts with rethinking how software is built, how teams are structured, and what the “senior” title really means in an AI era. Organisations that move beyond experimentation are willing to question their operating model, not just layer AI onto the way they’ve always worked.
eBook
As an ambitious business in a fast-moving market, Valve Space needed to expand engineering capacity quickly and flexibly to meet evolving product and customer demands. To support this, Valve Space opted to partner with a trusted nearshore team to accelerate delivery, complement in-house expertise and maintain momentum.
We were proud to be selected as that partner. Valve Space recognised our ability to attract and retain high-quality talent in North Macedonia, while valuing our strong cultural alignment and ability to work seamlessly as part of their team.
Our ‘partner-shoring’ approach to working with clients – a near-shoring model where the client and supplier work seamlessly and flexibly together towards common goals – aligned closely with Valve Space’s need for a scalable and collaborative delivery model and was a key factor in the company’s decision.
Since January 2024, we’ve been working closely with Valve Space to provide additional engineering capacity as part of their software engineering function.
We have supplied a team of skilled professionals, including:
These experts supplement Valve Space’s in-house team by carrying out product development and testing, supporting on complex projects for Valve Space’s product-led growth initiatives.
This has included:
Beyond pure technical expertise, we also supply additional support to enhance Valve Space’s team structure and workflow. This includes, as required:
One of the key highlights of the partnership so far has been a company-wide event we hosted at our headquarters in Skopje at the start of 2025. Here, the entire product and engineering teams from both companies assembled to work together and, after hours, enjoy a night of music and fun.
We are always keen proponents of this kind of gathering, to ensure distributed groups of colleagues meet face to face and can bond in person – and there is no doubt it boosted team morale, while fostering ever closer alignment and integration.
Thanks to our collaborative approach and technical expertise, the partnership between our two companies has yielded significant value for Valve Space, particularly when it comes to rapid product development, flexibility and efficiency – allowing Valve Space to sharpen its focus on delivering high-quality products to meet its customers’ needs to drive growth.
Above all, for a start-up company like Valve Space, the ability to rapidly align talent to priority initiatives is key. To date, we’ve contributed by:
At the same time, Valve Space benefits from strong organisational support, such as:
Additionally, as Lucinda Faucher, Valve Space’s VP of Product Management, explains:
“A successful partnership of this kind is always built on trust, and Damilah have proven to be reliable and collaborative partners for Valve Space.”
Lucinda is pleased that the current relationship between the two companies has been highly effective so far. As Valve Space continues to grow and maximise profits, we’re proud to be seen as a long-term partner in helping them deliver on their ambitions.
The partnership between Valve Space and Damilah exemplifies the benefits of working with a skilled, flexible, and trustworthy ‘partner-shoring’ provider. Our depth of expertise, proactive approach, and commitment to building a collaborative team culture – one that feels like a seamless extension of Valve Space’s own team – has made this a highly effective and rewarding collaboration.
As Lucinda puts it:
“Damilah fosters a positive culture that really cares about its people. Most importantly, they enjoy what they do and bring great energy to the team. They’re collaborative, knowledgeable, and have taken the time to understand our vision, which helps ensure they are aligned with where we are headed and how best to support us along the way.”
When it comes to thinking about new products, we often wish for more time to conduct interviews, analyze data, and explore competitors. But these tasks take up a lot of time. That’s where ChatGPT comes in handy—it can save us time and make our processes more efficient.
Let’s dive into the world of product discovery by tapping into ChatGPT’s vast pool of data and capabilities. This guide will walk you through how to use ChatGPT for a more efficient product discovery process, helping you prepare for the development of innovative products.
Prompt you can use: “I have a business objective and I’m looking to identify potential customer needs aligned with my goal. My objective is [specify your goal]. Could you please investigate the potential pain points experienced by this specific target group.”
Prompt you can use: “Can you please act as a Product Manager and explore the actual problem underneath these pain points? Please use the ‘5 Why’s’ method to find out why this problem is happening. Once you figure out the main reason, summarize your findings in a clear problem statement.”
Prompt you can use: “Could you please identify the top 5 crucial tasks (JBTD) that my target customers need to accomplish when dealing with the problem? I aim to gain a better understanding of the key activities customers will undertake, when facing the problem.”
Prompt you can use: “Could you please outline the three user personas who are likely to be my most frequent customers?”
Prompt you can use: “Would you be so kind as to create an empathy map for my target customers? I’m eager to gain a deeper understanding of their thoughts, feelings, what they see and hear, and what they say and do.”
Prompt you can use: “Picture yourself in a room with your team, including Software Engineers, UX/UI Designers, QA Testers, a Product Owner, and a Scrum Master. During an ideation process, what would be the three standout ideas as potential product solutions for addressing this customer’s problem?”
Prompt you can use: “Can you please define our value proposition for the first product solution? Describe how it meets customer needs, its unique benefits, and what makes it better than similar products on the market.”
Prompt you can use: “Can you explore other companies in the market selling similar products? Summarize their strengths and weaknesses and identify areas where we can gain a competitive advantage.”
Prompt you can use: “Please outline the key features for the product solution. Consider functionality, user experience, and any unique aspects that will set our product apart in the market. “
Prompt you can use: “Can you now please define the features and functionalities that are essential for our Minimum Viable Product (MVP)? Focus on the core elements that will allow us to deliver value to our users quickly and efficiently.”
To show that these prompts truly make a difference, we put them to the test in a real-life example. In this case study below, you can follow how we turned an idea into a possible product solution, with a clear explanation of our thought process.

















At the end we’ll say that ChatGPT can be a really valuable asset in product discovery, helping us save significant time. However, it’s important to remember that while ChatGPT and AI, in general, can be incredibly helpful, they don’t guarantee the automatic success of our products. Success still relies on thoughtful execution and a comprehensive approach beyond the capabilities of AI alone.
Olgica Strezoska, Principal Product Owner at Damilah
To avoid building products that nobody wants, extensive Product Discovery is essential before embarking on the actual development process.
What is Product Discovery?
Product discovery is a dynamic and iterative process that lays the foundation for successful product development. It is the process that helps product teams understand the real problems and needs that people have and then figure out the best ways to solve them before starting development.
The concept of product discovery originated during the 1990s. During that era, companies allocated substantial portions of their marketing budgets to persuade customers of their product’s necessity. Unfortunately, this led to a lot of very expensive failures, as products often made it to full release before companies realized that people just didn’t need or want them.
The main goal of product discovery is not to ship features but rather to promote a continuous environment of learning that will help improve the product incrementally and consistently.
Product discovery is all about de-risking. As Marty Cagan puts it in his book “Inspired”, the purpose of product discovery is to address these four critical risks:

The product Discovery process can be divided into these 4 phases:
1. Understanding Users
The first phase is all about user research and building empathy for our users. We must be able to put ourselves in users’ shoes, and that can be achieved only if we truly get to know them, listen to what they are saying, and learn about their habits, desires, and frustrations.
To achieve this understanding, several steps can be taken:
2. Defining the Problem
With a better understanding of the users, the next step is to precisely define the problem or need our product intends to solve. That can be done by analyzing the user research data we gathered and finding patterns that emerge from this data (using the Affinity mapping technique). By prioritizing the most important problems for users, the team can decide which user problem they want to focus on and clearly define their hypothesis before jumping into solutions.

3. Ideating and Prioritizing
Once we know what the user problem is, we should continue to the Ideation phase so that we can slowly come to the solution of the problem. This phase consists of gathering different ideas from the team (using brainstorming, mind mapping, or similar techniques) on how we can respond to the users’ problem or need. At the end of this phase, we have to prioritize the idea for which we are most confident it will bring value to the users so that we can continue prototyping and testing our hypothesis.
4. Prototyping and Validation
The final stage is about building a quick prototype to be tested and validated to gain confidence that the right product is going to be moved into the product delivery process. Prototyping ensures that the product solution aligns with the identified customer need and that users can navigate through the potential solution effectively.

Product discovery is the bedrock of successful product development. It empowers businesses to create innovative solutions that genuinely address user needs and desires. By deeply empathizing with the target audience, conducting thorough research, and actively listening to feedback, companies can build an environment of continuous learning and craft products that resonate deeply with their customers.
Olgica Strezoska, Principal Product Owner at Damilah